As
everybody knows: Sharing ain’t easy.
And frankly, when it comes
down to it, sharing is kind of a pain in the ass.
And when it comes to
playgrounds, where you (and that small human you’ve brought along with you)
came armed with toys galore, which consequently, given the nature of small
humans, get ignored and forgotten and abandoned, and then acquired by other
(unrelated) small humans, and then consequently abandoned and avoided and
ignored by those small humans, and
then another (anonymous) small human comes along and acquires these toys, and
then plays and abandons and ignores them, and on and on it goes, all while
you’re trying to instruct your child on the common decency rules of please,
thank you, you’re welcome, and what not, when people keep coming up and snaking
her toys right out of her reach, all the while, she’s hearing that she’s
supposed to say please, thank you, you’re welcome, and what not, when people
keep coming up and stealing her shit right out from under her nose, when what
she probably really wants to say (but can’t, given her 14 months) is: “Thank
you very much but keep your filthy mitts off my plastic bucket you little
spoiled brat.”
But
as a parent of an only child, I feel that all this is good practice for
her. It’s a sharing exercise, so
to speak. A way for my kid to
learn how other kids who live with other kids have to live when they live with
those other kids that they live with.
What
I’m really trying to say to my kid is:
“This is how the other half lives.”
So,
as my little one is gradually learning, per our established policy, when
anybody comes up on the playground and wants to play with our stroller or our
bucket or our cup or our sponge, she has to give it up and they are allowed to
play with it.
But
not everybody in the playground has similar a policy.
For
some, there’s no policy whatsoever.
There is just a sort of eminent domain. “I see it. It
is available. Therefore, it is
mine.”
For
others, there is no reasonable quid pro
quo. “Oh, I’ll take that,”
they say. Then they take it, with
no equal exchange.
For
some, the quid pro quo may indeed be
in the eye of the beholder, such as when the holder of a miniature stroller or
a sponge or a bucket is willing to exchange (albeit temporarily) their inferior
goods for a plastic cup or a burst water balloon or, frankly, someone’s own
father figure.
Because, in the end, if
everybody’s happy with an equal, if only temporary, exchange, then who can argue
with that? Certainly not me. And having
been traded, individually, and on several occasions, for, amongst other things,
a half-empty water bottle, a plastic truck, a half-eaten cheese stick, a
six-year-old dachshund, a handful of week-old dirt, two tennis balls, and an
abandoned shoe, I must naturally ask the question: Ain’t parenthood great?
0 comments:
Post a Comment